Thursday, May 31, 2012

Taxman


In response to those who are unable to attend my weekly Bible study on the Gospel According to MARK (Sunday’s at 10 am at Hollywood United Methodist Church), I share my thoughts and notes from previous sessions. While I’m not a scholar, I am an enthusiast. Enjoy!

This past weekend I was way under the weather, so the study group wasn’t able to get together; nevertheless, I’ll keep us moving forward with MARK. We’ll delve into this next part focusing on one specific group which will be helpful in consideration of the whole. Here we go!

Be Thankful I Don’t Take It All

Who loves to pay taxes? It doesn’t matter who you are, what your political affiliation or economic status is, whether you live inside or outside the U.S., who’s gung-ho about having your hard-earned money taxed? No matter the rational about taxes going toward whatever appropriate social cause or need, we still bristle for the most part at “taxes” in general.

I’ll write a word/acronym and let’s see what feelings arise for you. Here goes. …IRS.

For some, you’ll feel angst; others, ire; a few, possibly nothing. When I think of the IRS, what comes to mind is a title of a Beatles song – “Taxman”.

If you drive a car, I’ll tax the street,
If you try to sit, I’ll tax your seat.
If you get too cold, I’ll tax the heat,
If you take a walk, I’ll tax your feet. [i]

The lyrics written by George Harrison in the mid-1960s attacked the high levels of progressive tax taken by the British Labour government.

So where am I going with this? Tax collectors have been around a longgggg time, and they were certainly a part of life back when Jesus was alive. A big part. And the feeling of distrust, unease and negativity has been, too.

The stage is set for this particular section in MARK where three parties will eventually come together – tax collectors, Jesus and Pharisees.


There was a man, Matthew (otherwise known as Levi), who was a tax collector. Men of his ilk, in this position, were deemed as traitors. Why? Because they were known to cheat people (the Jews) and support Rome. Yet how were the people cheated?

“Any amount the tax collectors collected over what Rome required they were allowed to keep. Thus many became wealthy at the expense of their own people.” [ii]

But not all of these unsavory types collected Roman direct taxes or the Jewish Temple tax. Many belonged to a group responsible for local duties and tolls. Case in point shows two types of tax collectors:

·         Gabbai – who collected general taxes on land, property and income;
·         Mokhes – who collected on a variety of “use” tax which would include import, licenses and toll fees – with there being two types of Mokhes:
o   Great Mokhes – who hired others to collect taxes for them;
o   Small Mokhes – who did their own assessing and collecting.[iii]

Matthew was a Small Mokhes; yet, as stated within rabbinic and Christian texts, great or small,  “tax collectors are depicted as morally questionable,… least likely to engage in heartfelt repentance and lead a good life.” [iv] Even the Greek writer, Lucian categorized tax-gatherers with “adulterers, panderers, flatterers and sycophants.” [v]

Someone like Matthew, including those in his shoes, was ritually impure, unclean, outcast or choosing to cast themselves outside the societal circle (of good taste and human decency).

Two questions to leave you with. Why did Matthew follow Jesus? What does this say about Jesus?

And a statement. …Jesus wanted the person no one else wanted.

NEXT…
Putting the parties together; eating with the “separated ones”; infection


[i] “Taxman” – written by George Harrison
[ii] The MacArthur Study Bible, NKJV – p. 1461
[iii] The MacArthur Study Bible, NKJV – pp. 1461-1462
[iv] The Jewish Annotated New Testament, NRSV – p. 64
[v] The Gospel of Mark, Barclay – p. 46-47

Friday, May 25, 2012

Paralyzed -- Part 2


In response to those who are unable to attend my weekly Bible study on the Gospel According to MARK (Sunday’s at 10 am at Hollywood United Methodist Church), I share my thoughts and notes from previous sessions. While I’m not a scholar, I am an enthusiast. Enjoy!


Thoughts Before I Proceed
Adding to my list of resources for the study of MARK, and recommended for my research by my dear friends, Rabbi Brian Zimmerman and his wife, Mimi, I’ve added The Jewish Annotated New Testament (NRSV). It is absolutely integral in understanding Jewish perspective to the time of Jesus (and before), and the essays by Jewish scholars at the end of the book will prove to be helpful as we move forward. As for a point of reference, I want to include one statement made in this particular text as it relates to verses 6-7. “In a largely illiterate society, scribes played the role of the interpreters of the law. They are portrayed, as here and in what immediately follows, in negative terms as rule-bound and unable to grasp the significance of Jesus’ ministry. Since it is God who forgives, the statement is blasphemy from their point of view, but followers of Jesus claimed the power of forgiveness for their movement.” [i] I mention this because “teachers of the law” could be interpreted as “scribes” which may change who the players are in your mind; yet, these particular scribes did consider what Jesus had done as blasphemy.

Continuing with Part 2…
As Jesus sees into the heart of the paralytic (knowing there is another cause for his health predicament), he sees into the hearts of the scribes. He puts it to them in a simple way – paraphrasing – “Is it easier to say ‘your sins are forgiven’” or “Is it easier to say ‘get up, take your mat and walk (even though you’ve been paralyzed for who knows how long)?’”

Why did Jesus play the “forgiveness” card first unlike other times when he just healed people in need?

The study group discussed how there are times when we cause our own paralysis, where we are frozen, when stress causes illness, where the mind is a powerful tool – more than we realize, when our own dis-ease with life and what we have or haven’t done hinders us in such a way to block life’s energy – in or out.

Carlton, new to the group, shared his own experience in how he was paralyzed for years in living (or not living), and paralyzed in his view of God and Christ and the Church until he had open-heart surgery. That “seeing into his heart” caused a freedom to renew his spirit. Suddenly Carlton saw the world in a different way. By “forgiveness,” he knew he could not be the same anymore, and that was a good thing.

When mentioned could this “healing” by Jesus possibly be seen as a “magic act,” Marc Denton made it clear there was nothing magical about it. By being cured, the paralytic had been forgiven. Or another way to look at the situation, by being forgiven, he was healed.

Jesus knew the paralysis of sin (in whatever manner interpreted by this paralytic) was what needed to be freed. Then he would be able to walk away in a new light and in a new way.

In this controversy over the power of forgiving sins, let’s not forget Jesus refers to himself as the Son of Man – only the first time he’s mentioned this little nugget.

There are some historical texts that state “Jesus may have spoken of the Son of Man as a figure other than himself, the coming judge (Daniel 7:13), but in MARK, this figure is identified with Jesus.” [ii]

When considering the possibilities,… as God’s Son, what authority does Jesus have? To forgive sin. As a man though, what does that mean? Jesus can actually identify with us. He’s not just up on some pedestal or shelf to be admired. He’s here with us – experiencing the good and not-so-good – just like we are.

Nevertheless,…“If all this went on, all orthodox religion would be shattered and destroyed. In this incident, Jesus had signed his own death warrant – and he knew it.” [iii] Dramatically stated? Yes. By just this incident though? No, not in my opinion. Yet once Jesus walked down the path, there was no turning back – and he knew the price to be paid.

With everything shared in Parts 1 and 2 (MARK 2:1-12), I leave you with some parting questions: How often in our own lives are we or have we been paralyzed? How often would we be healed if only forgiven? If we truly believed we were forgiven? In the lives of those around us, if those paralyzed heard those words coming from our mouths, what would happen?

NEXT…
Pharisees, Jesus and Tax Collectors – oh, my!


[i] The Jewish Annotated New Testament (NRSV), p. 63
[ii] The Jewish Annotated New Testament (NRSV), p. 63
[iii] The Gospel of Mark, Barclay, p. 43

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Paralyzed – Part 1


In response to those who are unable to attend my weekly Bible study on the Gospel According to MARK (Sunday’s at 10 am at Hollywood United Methodist Church), I share my thoughts and notes from previous sessions. While I’m not a scholar, I am an enthusiast. Enjoy!


Jesus has been out-and-about, traveling on the outskirts of towns because his encounter with the leper caused quite a stir, especially among the city folk. There was good reason to keep clear of the crowds, but Jesus certainly knew he was called to be with “all” people. Plus, by returning to Capernaum, his message would spread faster and have greater impact.

Of course, his return (probably back at Peter and Andrew’s home) was met with an immediate frenzy. “He’s back!” “He’s here!” “Let’s see this man who can do miracles!” “Heal me!” “What good news do you have to share?!?” As verse 2 states, it was a mass of humanity desperate to meet the man who was changing lives.

A Thought to Ponder
Someone you care deeply about is in a dire circumstance. Everyone you know – even those in positions of authority (medical, religious,…) – says, “Sorry, there’s nothing we can do for this person.” No one gives your loved one a chance. But… word has it there is someone in town who’s different, amazing, touches lives, minds and hearts, and heals. No hocus-pocus; he’s the real deal. What would you do? And how would you approach the situation? How would you approach the person who could make your loved one, who is broken, whole again?

Inspired and with belief that a difference can be made, four men carry someone (who they care about and who is paralyzed) to meet Jesus. There is no way through the crowd though. Now what?

Did You Know…?
During that time, “most homes in Palestine had flat roofs. …There was usually an external stairway that extended to the roof. Often, as here, the roof was made of slabs of burnt or dried clay that were placed on supporting beams which stretched from wall to wall.” [i]

The four men broke through – giving new meaning to “through the roof.” They were determined and had faith that Jesus could renew their loved one in ways unimaginable by others.

In verse 5, see if you catch the key word (in my opinion) besides the obvious “forgiveness” portion. When Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralyzed man, “Son, your sins are forgiven.” [ii]

What do you think? Anything make you go, “Hmmm”?

Their faith. Not his faith. Their faith. An interesting word choice. It was their faith that could move mountains. Did that include the paralyzed man – faith or faithless? Is it imperative that the paralyzed man have faith to be healed? Something to consider and the implications therein.

Oh, oh,… a dark cloud hovers and lightning is about to strike. Among the throng of people who heard Jesus’ words are some strict religious leaders. They’re highly offended by his “forgiveness” statement. Why?

First, “the Sanhedrin was the supreme court of the Jews. One of its great functions was to be the strict guardian of orthodoxy. For instance, it was the Sanhedrin’s duty to deal with any man who was a false prophet.” [iii] During that time, there were many who claimed to be the Messiah and all had been declared as false.

Second, for Jesus to say to this man that his sins were forgiven was beyond reproach. Only God could forgive sins. It was blasphemy – insulting God – and the penalty for such an act was death by stoning (Leviticus 24:15,16).

For this paralyzed man, these Leaders of the Law deemed him as “sinful.” In that day, many “believed all disease and affliction were a direct result of one’s sins.” [iv] Sin and suffering were connected. Consider Job (from the Old Testament). His friend, Eliphaz the Temanite, asked Job during his calamity, “Who ever perished being innocent?” [v]

Sad but true, how much has changed from then to 2012? I know people who firmly believe disease and affliction are a direct result of one’s sins. Do you? 

NOTE – If you’d like to hear more about what Rev. Kathy has to say about this topic, a link (audio) to her sermon on April 15th – WHY!? “Does Everything Happen for a Reason?” follows:

For these leaders, forgiveness of sins was a prior condition to being cured or healed. Only God could forgive and heal.

The words of forgiveness have been stated for all to hear. There’s no turning back the clock. How dare Jesus give this man hope?!?  How dare Jesus blaspheme God?!?  The temerity of this Jesus!  How dare he?!?

But as Norma Corral said to the study group, “Jesus knew exactly what he was doing.”

NEXT…
Paralysis by choice? …A magic act? …A death warrant.




[i] The MacArthur Study Bible, p. 1460
[ii] Mark 2:6 (NIV)
[iii] The Gospel of Mark, Barclay, p. 42
[iv] The MacArthur Study Bible, p. 1460
[v] Job 4:7