Friday, July 13, 2012

Jesus-Mania!



Break-time! What better place to relax than at the lake -- so think Jesus and his small team. But… like the celebrities of our time, popularity knows no bounds. Where they go, people follow. Not only from Galilee. From far and wide.

50 miles to the north; 130 miles to the south. That’s the straight-shot distance traveled by those wanting to meet Jesus. The Marine (Joe) in our study group, estimated it would take about a week, with good fortune on your side (and no challenges along the way), to travel the terrain – coming from the south.

You’ve gotta want something BAD to go to those lengths!

And there are so many people. Unlike previous times where Jesus would approach those in need, crowd control was necessary as they rushed to see the healer. To avoid being trampled, Jesus stepped into a boat. Jesus-mania!

Most intriguing though in this section are the last two verses.

Are they "evil" spirits or "impure" spirits? Depends on the translation. There is definitely a tie-in later to the use of  “evil” but that’s for the next blog post. Yet it's important to understand the usage of both descriptive words.

“Evil” spoke clearly to people of the time – especially in relation to demons, in which many believed. Possession was like a go-to reason for those troubled. "Evil" was startling, frightening and could be interpreted as intentional.

What about those "impure" (or "unclean")? While the person who was "impure" needed to be helped, this specific word was meaningful to those who understood the rituals of cleansing – the required purification process. Jesus understood this too. Also, "impure" has less bite to it -- harm had been done but it wasn't malicious, as our former librarian, Norma, pointed out.

Go back to the earlier passage where Jesus healed the leper -- MARK 1:40-45. What did Jesus say to the man? Something stated on seven separate occasions in MARK – “Tell no one.” But he also had followed it up with a directive to see the priest. Why? To follow the ritual of purification – thereby incorporating something new (Jesus’ healing power) with something old (Old Testament rituals). “Purity codes are not set aside, but people are cleansed of their impurities.” [i]

Then there’s the “Son of God” phrase. Some want to believe this is set in stone, as in there is only one "Son of God", however…

‘In the ancient world Son of God was by no means an uncommon title. The kings of Egypt were said to be sons of Ra, their god. From Augustus onwards, many of the Roman Emperors were described on inscriptions as sons of God. The Old Testament itself has four ways in which it uses the term.
1)    The angels are the sons of God (Genesis 6:2, Job 1:6);
2)    The nation of Israel is the son of God (Hosea 11:1, Exodus 4:22);
3)    The king of the nation is the son of God (2 Samuel 7:14);
4)    In the later books, which were written between the Testaments, “The good man is the son of God “ (Sirach 4:10).
In all these cases the term son describes someone near and close to God. [ii]

Am I purposely trying to blow up the Gospel? No. What I am sharing is… there’s more to the story that is just on the page. And… it's abundantly clear with a small “s” or a big “S” – the relationship between Jesus and God was extremely close.

This son, Jesus… was different. He was not going to be the hoped-for, political / military leader who would squash Rome. But to reveal that “truth” would’ve side-tracked what Jesus was called to do. He wanted to show a vital, spiritual component to God’s kingdom. And the bigger difference would be with “Love.”

NEXT…
Rounding out the team to 12


[i] Jewish Annotated New Testament, NRSV – p. 63
[ii] The Gospel of Mark, Barclay – p. 66

No comments:

Post a Comment