Friday, January 11, 2013

Defiled -- Part 1



“You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to human traditions.”

With that statement, Jesus just threw down the gauntlet!

But… I’m getting ahead in the telling of this story shared in these verses. First things, first.

When we were last tracking Jesus and his disciples, they had crossed over the Sea of Galilee and reached Gennesareth. (Click on the link for interesting information about this ancient city.) Those who resided in this community flocked to Jesus for healing.

Time passes. How much time is not known exactly; nevertheless, one thing remains constant – the Pharisees are none too pleased with Jesus. In fact, they’ve asked for back up (some of the teachers of the law had come from Jerusalem [i]). It’s as though the Galilean Pharisees want reinforcements. Why? Because Jesus is hurting their pocketbooks and making them look bad. Then there is that emphasis on “love” and challenging history passed through the ages.

Sharing historical perspective will provide clarity as we move forward through this text.
·         While we know about the Torah (written), the Pharisees made interpretations of the Torah. Also their sages and rabbis decreed additional rules. Together, this became known as the Tradition of the Elders and later as the Oral Torah. It was then committed to writing, notably in what is known as the Mishna.[ii]
·         The Mishna is the first major redaction of the Jewish oral traditions and is also the first major work of Rabbinic Judaism. [iii]
·         What is “redaction”? This is “a form of editing in which multiple source texts are combined and subjected to minor alteration to make them into a single work.” [iv]

Where does this lead us? To the washing of hands. Note – this washing of hands was not in the interests of hygiene. Ceremony and ritual were front and center.

There was a path for all to follow regarding ritual hand-washing (“n’tilat-yadayim”) in details laid out in the Mishna tractate “Yadayim” (“Hands”). Impurity was removed by rinsing up to the wrist [v] Yet,… there was so much more to that which had been defiled.

DID YOU KNOW…?
“The man who ate with unclean hands was subject to the attacks of a demon called Shibta.” [vi]

For the Gentile audience (reading / listening to the Gospel), the writer states all Jews did not eat unless they followed the ceremonial washing. “All” is overstated here. “Sadducees didn’t follow the Pharisees in this matter.” [vii]

Look at verse four as the focus turns to the marketplace. To give you an idea of what was being required (through the Mishna), here’s just a sampling of what should occur with “uncleanness”:
·         “A hollow vessel made of pottery could contract uncleanness inside but not outside; that is to say, it didn’t matter who or what touched it outside, but it did matter what touched it inside. If it became unclean, it must be broken; and no unbroken piece must remain which was big enough to hold oil to anoint the little toe.”
·         “A flat plate without a rim can’t become unclean at all, but a plate with a rim can.”
·         “To cure uncleanness, earthen vessels must be broken; other vessels must be immersed, boiled, purged with fire – in the case of metal vessels – and polished.”
·         “Things made of metal can become unclean, except a door, a bolt, a lock, a hinge, a knocker and a gutter.” [viii]

Say what?!? No wonder heads were constantly turning, confusion existed, interpretation and guidance was needed, and folks were disconnected in relating to/with God. As Gene * stated, “There’s no way you could follow… live by all these rules without making a mistake. How could you understand them?” Norma * added, “You’d need a scholar to figure out the rules with the interpretation up for grabs. The everyday person would step back from religion.” Yes, and furthermore, there was an intentional step placed between the person and God – caused by these religious leaders.

The Pharisees then ask a seemingly simple question; however, there is much more behind the asking. It’s not directed at the disciples; it’s directed at Jesus. The prophet is teaching his disciples to disobey the Traditions of the Elders. How dare he commit such an act!

Jesus replies to them with a verse from Isaiah 29:13 – then throws down the gauntlet. He calls them out regarding their true motivation. Not the best way to make friends.

Now,… is Jesus condemning all of Pharisaic tradition; in essence, obliterating all of their practices? No. “In fact, he objects only to those practices of the P’rushim that place human tradition above God’s command.” [ix]

See in verse nine where Jesus uses the phrase, “your traditions”? The operative word here is “your.” Paraphrasing… “Your tradition wipes out the fifth Commandment, because you are telling people it’s more important to provide money to the Temple treasury than to support their parents in need.”

Breaking it down further… “Corban” means literally “sacrifice” from the Hebrew word “near.” You are bringing a gift near to God, and in doing so, you too are near to God. [x] When one does this, they have made a vow – dedicating this gift specifically to God. No one else.

Jesus though is questioning priorities, questioning the view of what an oath or vow really means and how that matches with what God really wants and requires. This is controversial. Which part of the Torah supersedes the other (honoring your parents or keeping vows)? Can a vow be repudiated? [xi]

Also what is happening… what Jesus points out… is the legalistic nature of the Pharisees and teachers of the law focusing on outward actions. Everything is being emphasized on that which is outward instead of that which is happening from within.

And here’s the rub… just because a person is clean on the outside doesn’t necessarily mean the same person is clean on the inside. Which should have priority? Inside or outside?

Going by rote isn’t going to cut it anymore. So… what does God really want?

NEXT
Jesus uses exaggeration and humor to make a point; are all foods “clean”?

[i] NIV, MARK 7:1
[ii] Jewish New Testament Commentary, p. 92
[iii] Wikepedia (Mishna)
[iv] Wikepedia (Redaction)
[v] Jewish New Testament Commentary, p. 92
[vi] The Gospel of Mark, p. 167
[vii] Jewish Annotated New Testament, p. 73
[viii] The Gospel of Mark, pp. 168-169
[ix] Jewish New Testament Commentary, p. 92
[x] Jewish New Testament Commentary, p. 93
[xi] Jewish Annotated New Testament, p. 75

* Member of Study Group

No comments:

Post a Comment