Thursday, June 13, 2013

To Serve versus To Be Served




"They." So that we’re on the same page, there were a lot of "they" on the road with Jesus. Passover is approaching which will bring many people to Jerusalem. To give you an idea,…

* "Weeks before the holiday, the trickles began from Asia Minor, from Egypt, from Africa, from Italy, from Greece, from Mesopotamia." [i]
* "The number of Jewish pilgrims to the Temple was computed by the governor Gesius Florus (64-66), who counted 256,500 paschal lambs at one Passover festival; allowing ten persons to one lamb, this would make 2,565,000 pilgrims (Josephus, "B. J." vi. 9)." [ii]
* A footnote to that number of pilgrims as stated by Josephus. "The numbers are certainly exaggerated (the city precincts would not have been able to accommodate so many people) and meant to emphasize Jewish religious solidarity at a time of Roman occupation." [iii]

Regardless of the validity of Josephus' estimate, the sheer number of pilgrims was significantly large. Marc * shared, "To give a modern-day example, think of Mecca today during the great Islamic festivals which attract hundreds of thousands of Muslims."

The pilgrimage has begun from around the globe. "They" approach Jerusalem, already in anticipation. On the road, Jesus teaches and shares the message of Good News. He gains more followers. The group expands, as they are in awe of this amazing Rabbi.

Understand though, "they" were also afraid. Darn-tooting. The leaders of the Establishment are none too happy with Jesus, and if anyone thinks this will go over well in Jerusalem,… brace yourselves. Nonetheless, a revolution is stirring in the hearts of humanity, especially those who are anti-Establishment.

Jesus takes his disciples aside and for the third time (this one with the most detail), he tells them about his upcoming death and resurrection.

Do the disciples believe Jesus is going to die? The Christ has certainly made it clear this will happen. Graphically clear. And I think the disciples have that gnawing gut feeling/understanding of it. The request of James and John in the next verses gives an indication of this. But coming to terms with death and what that means for the Messiah, what that means in their "head versus gut" understanding of the Messiah,… that's something else.

Yet,… the disciples still follow.

Then comes the moment that actually made me laugh. Lord, we humbly request that you do exactly what we ask. Seriously?

Of course, I must admit I was also sadly laughing at myself for I've done the same exact thing over the course of time. Lord, I humbly request that you do exactly what I ask. Makes me want to take a step back and reflect in my own approach.

Another version of "the humble request" has a simpler, Lord, we'd like you to do something for us. Frankly, I think the first version is more in line with what we know about James and John. They come from a family where their dad, Zebedee, employs hired servants (1:20). Given their past, they have been served.

Even if you prefer what Matthew 20:20-21 revealed -- that their mother, Salome (sister of Mary, mother of Jesus), made the approach to the Christ -- it involves the brothers. In this gospel, the approach is more personal; it's a family matter. There's still something misguided and ambitious in the timing.

For certainty though, James and John didn't doubt who Jesus said he was. That comes across clearly as they continue.

The Messiah, the King, the Ruler of All,… "when you take your place on the throne, when you are in power, we want the top places in your cabinet. It doesn't matter to us who is on the right and who is on the left. We just want to be in the power positions alongside you." Another way to look at this is, "When you're in power, which means we'll also be in power, we can get our way. It'll be good to be served!" Or as Mel Brooks would say, "It's good to be the King!" [iv]

With an approach like this coming from two of his most trusted disciples, you'd think there would've been a serious "come to Jesus meeting." In this instance, it was a different type of Jesus meeting.

You have no idea what you're asking.

James and John "think" they do, but they really don't.

Jesus then speaks to them about the cup and the baptism. The cup is "a metaphor for consequences that must be accepted (Psalm 75:8; Isaiah 51:17,22), which usually merited suffering resulting from one's wrongdoing." [v] He is accepting the cup in place of others.

Regarding baptism, remember Mark 1:8? John the Baptist predicted Jesus would baptize with the Holy Spirit. He is accepting the consequences of that baptism.

"The expression, as Jesus used it here, had nothing to do with technical baptism. What he is saying is, 'Can you bear to go through the terrible experience which I have to go through? Can you face being submerged in hatred and in pain and death, as I have to be?'" [vi]

Taking it at face value without full understanding of the consequences, James and John respond, "Yes! We absolutely know what we're asking. We're able to drink from the cup and be baptized with the baptism that you were." Or as Gene * stated, "While they didn't know what it truly involved, it was the idea of it."

It's here in which Jesus knowingly concurs. "You're right. You will drink the cup I drink and be baptized in my baptism."

Can you imagine seeing the brothers nodding their heads? "See?!? We were right!" Suffering from persecutions, even though Jesus told them they would, was the last thing on their minds.

Did You Know…?
Years later…
John faced martyrdom which some records reflect he was placed in a huge basin of boiling oil during a wave of persecution in Rome. Miraculously he survived this experience (if true). He was sentenced to the mines on the prison island of Patmos where he wrote the Book of Revelation.
Older brother, James (the Greater), was eventually beheaded in Jerusalem by Herod Agrippa. Interesting tidbit, the officer who guarded and walked beside James to the place of execution was overcome by his conviction. The officer declared his new faith to the judge. In doing so, the officer knelt beside James and was executed as well. [vii]

Within the last verse, Jesus tells the two brothers, "To sit at my right hand or at my left is not mine to grant, but it is for those whom it has been prepared." [viii] To be the Messiah, one would think Jesus could grant anything; however, he refutes it.

In considering these six verses as they relate to Jesus, James and John and reflecting on the past to the present, it's an attention-getter how much wealth, power, control, connections, position mean in today's world -- just like it was then. And Jesus reminds us, "That's not what the Good News is about. That's not what I am about."

The last thing I leave you with is something of imagery. This isn't necessarily apt to Jesus' reply; nevertheless, when I read "at my right" and "at my left" and knowing what is to come, I found it chilling yet stirring.

When Jesus is crucified, who is at his right and his left? The lowest of the low. Even then, he continues to be in the company of those who are deemed lesser than, unworthy. Reaching out to bring the Message. To love. To change lives. And he does so for one of those on a cross next to him -- even in the agony of death -- who comes to him like a child.

NEXT
The troubling "ransom"


[i] www.keithhunt.com
[ii] www.jewishencyclopedia.com
[iii] Jewish Travel in Antiquity, Catherine Hezser -- p. 377
[iv] History of the World, Part I (Mel Brooks film)
[v] Jewish Annotated New Testament -- p. 82
[vi] The Gospel of Mark, Barclay -- p. 225
[vii] www.reclaimingthemind.org
[viii] NRSV, Mark 10:40

* Member of the study group

Thursday, June 6, 2013

The Take-Away


MARK 10:13-16

Two sections of Scripture to cover but the first section of three verses (13-16) are a go-between regarding Jesus' previous focus -- divorce -- and what's to follow -- entering the kingdom of God.

First, the children. I believe the author of this gospel intentionally placed these verses here even if this event didn't happen exactly at that precise moment. In the first century, children had no legal rights (like women under the law of divorce). Both were powerless in the eyes of men. Not so with Jesus.

Why did the disciples shoo the little children away from the Christ? Given the increased tension as they travel toward Jerusalem, given Jesus has returned in a land ruled by a king who has no qualms in cutting off a man's head, the disciples may have been protecting their leader -- or so they thought. Why waste the Messiah's time and energy on mundane things? And on children no less!

But Jesus makes it very clear. Children are important, and should be viewed as such. "Don't push them away."

Children don't typically view the world from a point of science or philosophy. They have an openness to accept. To feel. To not over-think. To trust. To go on faith. The example of children applies to all of humanity.

His line of simplicity -- accepting / receiving the kingdom of God like a child -- radically shifts thoughts of religion and God. It's another reminder that position plays no role.

Moving forward… to a narrative that is the only instance in the four Gospels where someone refuses a call to follow Jesus -- verses 17-31. The young (Matthew 19:20) ruler (Luke 18:18) refuses to enter the kingdom of God as a little child. …But I'm getting ahead of the story.

This excited man runs up to Jesus, greets him with great reverence and asks a serious question. "What must I do to get eternal life?" To the man who seemingly has it all -- young, rich, and a ruler in the synagogue most likely -- something is clearly lacking in his life. Otherwise, why ask the question?

Note when Jesus replies "You know the commandments," he doesn't name all ten commandments. He skips the first four. Why? Maybe because of the young man's "official position" as a ruler in the synagogue. It would be a given (those first four), or so it would seem. So Jesus lists five outside of the man's position. The enthused ruler exclaims, "I've kept them all!"

Does Jesus refute the man's claim that he has kept them all? No. He takes this ruler at his word that he's done no harm to anyone. And Jesus genuinely loves him so much.

Now comes the kicker, because it will be the moment of truth. If Jesus had stated the tenth commandment using the neighbor (as written), the rich man would’ve probably said, "I've kept that one, too! I've not taken advantage of anyone to obtain my wealth." Yet there's a twist to the commandment.

The tenth commandment is one of covetousness. Yes, it involves one's neighbor but Jesus turns it around to get the heart of the matter. "With all your possessions, with all your wealth, with all that you could give away, what positive good have you done for others? How much have you gone out of your way to help and strengthen others as you might have done?" [i] You've "not done" so I ask you to "do" something for your neighbors. Jesus centers the attention not on "taking away" but on "giving."

Coming from a culture where wealth was seen as a blessing for moral behavior, the ruler would have a belief system where God has justly rewarded him with prosperity. Jesus has made it known wealth isn't a sign of God's favor. Yet, does Jesus have a problem with someone who is rich? No. Having money isn't wrong. However, when money becomes your god, it is a barrier between you and God. How are you using that which has been given to you? That's the true "take-away" for us.

I like what Timothy Keller wrote in Jesus The King, with Jesus speaking to the young man:

'"I want you to imagine life without money. I want you to imagine all of it gone. No inheritance, no inventory, no servants, no mansions -- all of that is gone. All you have is me. Can you live like that?" How does the man respond to Jesus' counseling? "He went away sad." The word sad translated here is better translated "grieved" -- he grieved. …When Jesus called this young man to give up his money, the man started to grieve, because money was for him what the Father was for Jesus. It was the center of his identity. To lose his money would have been to lose himself.' [ii]

Here, I believe Jesus grieves, too. The young man has walked away with a heavy heart. Jesus turns to his disciples and says, "Those who think they have it all, who you may think have it all, this young ruler shows us how difficult it is to enter the kingdom of God like a child." "It's easier for a camel to go through a needle's eye than for the rich to get into God's kingdom."

Did You Know…?
"The Persians expressed impossibility by saying it would be easier to put an elephant through the eye of a needle. This was a Jewish colloquial adaptation of that expression denoting impossibility (the largest animal in Palestine was a camel)." [iii]

"This is crazy! If he can't get in, then who can?!?" is what the disciples asked, being flummoxed. Jesus replies, "You can't make it about you. Let it go. Let God be God, and allow him to work through you." To which Peter replies, "Lord, we let it go! We've given up everything to follow you these past three years."

Jesus knows this to be true. It's not easy to follow the Christ. Nevertheless new bonds have been formed when taking this step. Your natural family has been replaced (or added to) with a wonderful, large community of disciples -- more than you can imagine. What a blessing!

However, Jesus makes it clear,… persecution follows the follower of Christ. If you follow Jesus, it won't be easy and it'll cost you.

His last statement is one for reflection. Will greatness put us first? Or wealth? In whose eyes? Not in God's. Be careful of pride. We must search our hearts. We must search our souls. Because what makes up heaven and the kingdom for God is not what makes up the earth in the eyes of adults. Let us receive it as a child.

NEXT
"Lord, I humbly request you do exactly what I say."


[i] The Gospel of Mark, Barclay -- p. 244
[ii] Jesus The King, Timothy Keller -- p. 144
[iii] The MacArthur Study Bible -- p. 1482

Thursday, May 30, 2013

Cause to Pause -- Part 2




A reminder -- Part 1 dealt with divorce in first-century Judaism

And… another lengthy post to wrap up a complicated "life" topic. Thoughts from a dear friend, Shan Watkins, are included. She went through a divorce which was very difficult but is now happily married. Thorns were with the rose though.

As I mentioned last week, I'm a product of divorce. My dad has been married twice -- the second being my mother, and they celebrated their 63rd wedding anniversary this past March. I guess my sister and I should count our blessings for our dad's remarriage.

But it's more than that…down my dad's line. Divorced: my grandfather (once, never remarried), my grandmother (lost count, could have been six), my great-aunt (twice, didn't go for a third try). Most recently, my sister became a divorcee and has remarried.

Divorce made a significant impact on me, although it wasn't a topic of open conversation in my family. In my early teens, I remember my fundamentalist grandmother, who I called Mom, being in a marriage that lasted in the blink of an eye. When I was 18, she remarried an older gentleman who I found endearing. In a matter of months though, she told me that she would be divorcing him. I won't go into her reasons for the divorce but none made sense to me. It was as if marriage was a joke to her, and it placed a HUGE wedge between us… a wedge so deep and so wide that I avoided her for 10 years after.

Fortunately, when moving to LA at that 10-year mark, Mom and I were able to mend fences as she lived nearby. To get to the point of forgiving her was not easy, but by the sheer grace of God (probably more like tug-a-war), I was able to do so. She came to understand the hurt caused by her actions. I came to understand mine. Our relationship was restored. That's not always the case when it comes to divorce.

I believe Jesus was on to something in these 12 verses when he chided the Pharisees (those who were committing the very act of divorce) and in teaching his disciples. He emphasized marriage as being an important, sacred vow taken before God. To break that "indivisible" union causes more damage than can ever be imagined. It's not one life impacted by divorce; not two; it's numerous lives.

Case in point, Shan shared with me after her divorce, years later, the effects "live on in me, in my children, in my entire family. Even though the gaping wounds have healed, there are deep, ugly scars that can't be ignored."

My sister and I would agree. Every one of us in our family has been affected by her divorce, and the ripple effect constantly shifts from person to person.

But… surely these 12 verses in MARK are only applicable to first-century Judaism. Right? What would Jesus say to us now as it relates to marriage and divorce?

In Shan's opinion, we as Christians have grown so callous to divorce that we see it as hurtful but not necessarily sinful. So why isn't divorce at the forefront for Christian thought / study and made a core issue?

When I picked up Adam Hamilton's book Confronting the Controversies -- divorce was nowhere to be found. Biblical perspectives were focused on these issues: the separation of church and state, creation and evolution in the public schools, the death penalty, euthanasia, prayer in public schools, abortion, homosexuality. Divorce has seemingly become passé, an afterthought.

Some may say, "Oh, Mark; you're letting your Southern, conservative roots show." I can hear my sister laugh at the conservative part.

Did You Know…?
(1) In America, there's one divorce every… 13 seconds. That's 6,646 divorces per day, and 46,523 divorces per week. The average length of a marriage that ends in divorce is eight years. [i]
(2) The Barna Research Group measured divorce statistics by religion. They found 29% of Baptists were divorced (the highest for a religious group). Only 21% of atheists/agnostics were divorced. Christians don't have the corner on successful marriages!
(3) In the U.S.:
          * 41% of first marriages end in divorce;
          * 60% of second marriages end in divorce;
          * 73% of third marriages end in divorce. [ii]
"While conventional wisdom says half of all marriages end in divorce, the real number is hard to pin down -- some states don't collect data on divorce, and people who marry and divorce a lot can skew the figures -- but many experts say a better estimate is closer to 40%." [iii]
(4) 43% of children in America today are raised without their fathers. 28% of children living with a divorced parent are in a household with an income below the poverty line. [iv]
(5) Think it's just an "American" situation? A 2011 Center of Social Justice study showed 48% of children in the United Kingdom were likely to see their parents split before they reached the age of 16. Ten years prior,… the rate was 40%.

Frightening stats, huh? With that in mind…

Let us be careful in taking a revolutionary teaching by Jesus based in justice and equality (to what was happening in the first century) and allowing it to become "a rule dogmatically rooted in oppression" [v] for today.

Let's not overlook a key element that Jesus was shaking up the Establishment. He was an advocate for the rights of women. To say what he did to the Pharisees was jaw-dropping -- on behalf of women. According to biblical scholar Walter Wink, Jesus violated the mores of his time in every single encounter with women recorded in the four Gospels.

This radical graciously accepted a prostitute's anointing. Women joined his followers along the journey, which you know created gossip. Jesus did miracles on behalf of women. In John 4:1-27, Jesus asked a Samaritan woman for help. The story reveals his knowledge of her having been through husbands like pocket-change. Where was Jesus' judgment since clearly she had done wrong? By the end, we know this woman led a spiritual renewal.

Jesus' involvement with women was a life-changer, a game-changer, a religion-changer, a spiritual-changer.

Back then as in today, people still use religion for their own desires, to protect their own selfish interests, instead of putting the focus on God. People find ways to use the Bible in a hurtful manner. That could even include staying in an abusive, oppressive marriage because clergy or family or friends have evoked these verses "literally" against divorce.

As Shan told me, which members of the study group stated too, "There are a few marriages that I personally thought were more tragic than divorce."

Would Jesus want us to take every attempt to save the marriage? Absolutely. Divorce however should be the last step. But it takes two people who are committed to honesty, facing the truth about what part they play in conflict, to be willing to expand, grow, change and work.

As Bev * (a widow) told the study group, "In my 35-year marriage, we had our up's; we had our down's. We had to work at it. Communication was key. And it takes two."

Shan agreed with Bev's thoughts, but said she would "add respect as being more important than love in a marriage." More important?!? That'll give you pause.

It goes in hand with what Leah * responded with: "We've become a culture that romanticizes marriage -- Love conquers all. Popular culture doesn't teach us about communication."

Sounds odd since we've become a nation focused on communication with our smartphones, laptops, tablets, social networking,…. To which Joe * replied, "Today's tools of communication actually create isolation. It hasn't advanced the concept." Patrick * reminded us about someone being dumped in a relationship via a text message.

Jesus encourages us to be in authentic relationships. Authentic with each other; authentic with God. Are you centered on "you" or are you centered on "us"? Have you searched your soul when conflict arises? Joe * reminded us of the phrase, "If you want a better wife, be a better husband." To be a better partner, one has to look within themselves to make the change.

In the 63 years of marriage for my parents, there have been stormy times; they could've easily thrown in the towel. Yet they didn't. There has been a lot of work done together over 63 years. A lot of forgiveness. A lot of grace. A lot of love. A lot of respect. But it also took two willing partners to do this.

When we enter into marriage -- ''for better or for worse, for richer or for poorer, in sickness and in health,'' we are entering into God's kingdom as well as into the unknown with each other. Unexpected surprises will surface. Guaranteed. They will disrupt the romance. Issues along the way may arise, such as abuse, oppression, adultery and other horrible instances which shake us to our core.

We trust ourselves with our lives, but where is God? Are we actually trusting God with our lives? With our flaws and all?

Marriage is a spiritual unity. We must show compassion, acceptance, and provide an endless supply of forgiveness before stepping away in a marriage.

None of us is perfect. Yet none of us is a mistake. Each of us nevertheless will make mistakes along the way. What did Jesus teach us? To forgive. To forgive them. To forgive ourselves. He wants us to be whole. Whatever stands in the way, even if we choose to divorce, we need to resolve those issues and conflicts so we can be healthy. And authentic.

Shan found these words (in the paragraph above) comforting while being something she needed the most. My close, loving friend stated, "Forgiving myself is a daily struggle, but I know I am more whole and definitely more authentic than ever before in my life."

I believe Jesus would also remind us, "Know God loves you no matter what. That I love you no matter what. That you are loved no matter what."

Let us humbly accept God as he is revealed in Jesus. Let us accept ourselves, flaws and all. Let us accept ourselves as the person God has chosen to be his. Let us work on being authentic.

NEXT
What makes you "first" -- having it all?


[i] www.mckinleyirvin.com
[ii] www.mckinleyirvin.com
[iii] "The End of Alimony," TIME, May 27, 2013 -- Belinda Luscombe
[iv] www.mckinleyirvin.com
[v] "Just Marriage: Jesus, Divorce and the Vulnerable," October 3, 2012 -- David R. Henson

* Member of the study group